啊!!!!!! 又是K书的季节 !!!!!
考试从上个星期二已经开始了,一直考到五月二号。 算一算,还有十几天叻。
这是我在hall2里的桌子!不大不小刚刚好。就只差一架电脑。
厚厚的课本是从Lib2借来的。你也许不知道,南大生可以借十本书!!
当然,我的ZEN也不会离我太远。
K书又那里可以少了吃的呢!!!!!!!
话说回来,前些日子部长薪金的话题至今也算是告了一个段落。 其实我看喉,这只不过是新加坡政府自编自导的一部戏。 为了是要制造新闻并且引起国际社会的注意。
哪怕是拿石头砸自己的双脚,让他人演坏人。 之后,男主角出来说什么“我愿意把我加薪的一部份捐出来。可是他的演技烂透了,有用脑想一想的话就看得出他真正的目的。
好了,考完试后,我再做多一点的解释。
加油!!
Friday, April 20, 2007
Tuesday, April 10, 2007
PAY AND PAY !!
Woo hoo !! In the end, they still insisted to upz their salary. PM of Spore will then be earning 5 times more than the President of US. Gosh, the PM of Spore must be a really "VERY IMPORTANT PERSON". Hmmm.. i wonder who he is...
*cough**cough*
By the way, when has the government ever listened to the people. So, no matter what we said, they will listen and forget.
*tsk**tsk*
Actually, i am not against the increase in the salary if Spore has becomes a better place for you and me. If the poor are really being helped, if life is not that stress, maybe it will be more justifiable for the increase.
So, is the increase in GST to fund the increase in their salaries ?
And gosh, what's with the release of the economical figures today. What is the government trying to prove ??
That, we are really doing very well ?
That, they really deserved the increment ?
I used to dislike a very old man. Then after reading his book, some respect for him. Then after his "threats", i find him rather disgusting.
But, come to think of it. Is there a hidden agenda somewhere ?
What is this old man trying to do ?
Questions questions questions, so many questions but no answers. Who can help ah ?
EXAMS are really really really CLOSE !! 加油 desu !!
*cough**cough*
By the way, when has the government ever listened to the people. So, no matter what we said, they will listen and forget.
*tsk**tsk*
Actually, i am not against the increase in the salary if Spore has becomes a better place for you and me. If the poor are really being helped, if life is not that stress, maybe it will be more justifiable for the increase.
So, is the increase in GST to fund the increase in their salaries ?
And gosh, what's with the release of the economical figures today. What is the government trying to prove ??
That, we are really doing very well ?
That, they really deserved the increment ?
I used to dislike a very old man. Then after reading his book, some respect for him. Then after his "threats", i find him rather disgusting.
But, come to think of it. Is there a hidden agenda somewhere ?
What is this old man trying to do ?
Questions questions questions, so many questions but no answers. Who can help ah ?
EXAMS are really really really CLOSE !! 加油 desu !!
Saturday, April 07, 2007
"Your security will be at risk and our women will become maids in other people's countries," he said.
"Your security will be at risk and our women will become maids in other people's countries,"
Is LKY threatening Singaporeans ???
Reuters says that they may give in to the pressure from the petition ( http://www.petitiononline.com/paypap1/petition.html and ), etc, so never write off the power of your voice!
=========Print this article Close this window
Singapore's Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong smiles as he speaks to Reuters on the sidelines of 12th Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Summit in Cebu in this file photo from January 14, 2007. REUTERS/Bazuki Muhammad
Singapore ministers set for million-dollar pay hike
Thu Apr 5, 2007 2:51PM EDTBy Koh Gui Qing
SINGAPORE (Reuters) - The salary of the prime minister of Singapore is more than three times that of U.S. President George Bush and about four times that of Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. But that is not enough.
Singapore's Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong may soon be getting a hefty pay rise as part of a controversial ministerial salary hike that has infuriated many Singaporeans.
Lee, who is estimated to earn about S$2 million (669,265 pounds) per year, said last month that the salaries of Singapore ministers, top public officials and judges have fallen way below benchmark private sector salaries and may need to be doubled.
"It is critical for us to keep these salaries competitive, so as to be able to bring in a continuing flow of able and successful people," Lee said in a speech in March.
Lee said that Singapore ministers, who currently earn about S$1.2 million a year, should be earning S$2.2 million. Details of the new ministerial salaries will be announced in parliament on April 9.
Since 1994, the salaries of Singapore ministers have been set at two-thirds the median pay of the 48 best-paid bankers, lawyers, accountants, engineers, and executives in multi-nationals and manufacturing firms.
But the latest salary hike, which comes at a time when income disparity in Singapore is wider than ever, has sparked an outpour of unusually blunt criticism from Singaporeans.
Hundreds have signed an online petition and the readers' letter columns of the state-controlled newspapers -- one of the few outlets for dissenting views in the city-state -- have published a series of letters protesting the planned hike.
"GOVERNMENT ALWAYS WINS"
Some Singaporeans argue that the six lucrative professions on which ministers' salaries are based do not reflect the country's economy or the government's performance.
"No matter what happens to the economy, the government always wins because it takes only the best results," Jacob Tan said in a letter to the Straits Times.
And given that a 2 percentage point rise in sales tax from July will further hit the poor, some said the government plan is tactless.
"I am rather disappointed with the government's insensitivity," reader Vanessa Teo said.
But the sharpest criticism was online. The "awesome raise on top of their already obscene pay is completely unjustifiable," read an online petition that has gathered 304 signatures.
Given the rare public outcry, analysts said the government may now hesitate to raise salaries by the full S$1 million.
"I would be surprised if they implemented the full formula that would give them over S$2 million," said Garry Rodan, director of the Asia Research Centre at Murdoch University.
The government defends the high salaries as necessary to attract the brightest people and to prevent corruption.
"If we don't do that ... corruption will set in and we will become like many other countries," Defence Minister Teo Chee Hean was quoted as saying in the Straits Times last week.
Singapore government officials' salaries are set by different wage formulas, depending on their seniority. The figures are not readily available to the public, but the prime minister earned S$1.94 million in 2000, according to the Straits Times.
Ministers' wages were last raised in 2000, but were cut in 2001 and 2003 during the economic downturn, although the cuts have since been reversed, the Public Service Division said.
"ABLE GENERALS"
Some argue that Singapore ministers are not overpaid, but that ministers elsewhere are underpaid.
Singapore is an oasis of wealth, peace and law and order in a region rife with poverty, violence and corruption.
The island state is Asia's second-richest country after Japan, with a gross domestic product per capita of about $31,000 (15,695 pounds).
The World Economic Forum ranks Singapore as the fifth-most competitive of 125 economies in 2006, while Transparency International said the city-state was the fifth-most corruption-free nation out of 163. Isn't that worth a price?"
According to a Chinese proverb, an able general is worth more than 10,000 foot soldiers. So too is the worth of our leaders if they have the wisdom to help us weather global competition," reader Yik Keng Yeong said.
But critics say that the prosperity and security enjoyed by Singaporeans are not that different from other Asian first-world economies such as Japan, Korea and Taiwan, where government ministers do not command such high salaries.
Finland, for instance, beat Singapore in the WEF and Transparency International polls -- as second-most competitive and most corruption-free country -- but its Prime Minister Matti Vanhanen earns about a sixth of Lee's estimated salary.
What irks Singapore's opposition parties is that the million-dollar salaries are only accessible to members of Lee's ruling People's Action Party. Opposition politicians have been crippled by defamation lawsuits brought by government ministers and no opposition party has ever held a ministerial post.
The opposition also argues that a million-dollar pay hike is unwarranted for leaders of a country that has no legal minimum wage and where 20 percent of the population earns an average monthly salary of S$1,500.
But Lee Kuan Yew -- modern Singapore's first prime minister, who is still the leading voice in his son's cabinet -- will have none of it.
"The cure to all this talk is really a good dose of incompetent government," Lee senior told the Straits Times on Thursday, adding that it is "absurd" for Singaporeans to quarrel about ministerial pay and warning that Singapore would suffer it the government could not pay competitive salaries.
"Your security will be at risk and our women will become maids in other people's countries," he said.
(Additional reporting by Sakari Suoninen in Helsinki, Isabel Reynolds in Tokyo, Joanne Allen in Washington)
Is LKY threatening Singaporeans ???
Reuters says that they may give in to the pressure from the petition ( http://www.petitiononline.com/paypap1/petition.html and ), etc, so never write off the power of your voice!
=========Print this article Close this window
Singapore's Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong smiles as he speaks to Reuters on the sidelines of 12th Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Summit in Cebu in this file photo from January 14, 2007. REUTERS/Bazuki Muhammad
Singapore ministers set for million-dollar pay hike
Thu Apr 5, 2007 2:51PM EDTBy Koh Gui Qing
SINGAPORE (Reuters) - The salary of the prime minister of Singapore is more than three times that of U.S. President George Bush and about four times that of Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. But that is not enough.
Singapore's Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong may soon be getting a hefty pay rise as part of a controversial ministerial salary hike that has infuriated many Singaporeans.
Lee, who is estimated to earn about S$2 million (669,265 pounds) per year, said last month that the salaries of Singapore ministers, top public officials and judges have fallen way below benchmark private sector salaries and may need to be doubled.
"It is critical for us to keep these salaries competitive, so as to be able to bring in a continuing flow of able and successful people," Lee said in a speech in March.
Lee said that Singapore ministers, who currently earn about S$1.2 million a year, should be earning S$2.2 million. Details of the new ministerial salaries will be announced in parliament on April 9.
Since 1994, the salaries of Singapore ministers have been set at two-thirds the median pay of the 48 best-paid bankers, lawyers, accountants, engineers, and executives in multi-nationals and manufacturing firms.
But the latest salary hike, which comes at a time when income disparity in Singapore is wider than ever, has sparked an outpour of unusually blunt criticism from Singaporeans.
Hundreds have signed an online petition and the readers' letter columns of the state-controlled newspapers -- one of the few outlets for dissenting views in the city-state -- have published a series of letters protesting the planned hike.
"GOVERNMENT ALWAYS WINS"
Some Singaporeans argue that the six lucrative professions on which ministers' salaries are based do not reflect the country's economy or the government's performance.
"No matter what happens to the economy, the government always wins because it takes only the best results," Jacob Tan said in a letter to the Straits Times.
And given that a 2 percentage point rise in sales tax from July will further hit the poor, some said the government plan is tactless.
"I am rather disappointed with the government's insensitivity," reader Vanessa Teo said.
But the sharpest criticism was online. The "awesome raise on top of their already obscene pay is completely unjustifiable," read an online petition that has gathered 304 signatures.
Given the rare public outcry, analysts said the government may now hesitate to raise salaries by the full S$1 million.
"I would be surprised if they implemented the full formula that would give them over S$2 million," said Garry Rodan, director of the Asia Research Centre at Murdoch University.
The government defends the high salaries as necessary to attract the brightest people and to prevent corruption.
"If we don't do that ... corruption will set in and we will become like many other countries," Defence Minister Teo Chee Hean was quoted as saying in the Straits Times last week.
Singapore government officials' salaries are set by different wage formulas, depending on their seniority. The figures are not readily available to the public, but the prime minister earned S$1.94 million in 2000, according to the Straits Times.
Ministers' wages were last raised in 2000, but were cut in 2001 and 2003 during the economic downturn, although the cuts have since been reversed, the Public Service Division said.
"ABLE GENERALS"
Some argue that Singapore ministers are not overpaid, but that ministers elsewhere are underpaid.
Singapore is an oasis of wealth, peace and law and order in a region rife with poverty, violence and corruption.
The island state is Asia's second-richest country after Japan, with a gross domestic product per capita of about $31,000 (15,695 pounds).
The World Economic Forum ranks Singapore as the fifth-most competitive of 125 economies in 2006, while Transparency International said the city-state was the fifth-most corruption-free nation out of 163. Isn't that worth a price?"
According to a Chinese proverb, an able general is worth more than 10,000 foot soldiers. So too is the worth of our leaders if they have the wisdom to help us weather global competition," reader Yik Keng Yeong said.
But critics say that the prosperity and security enjoyed by Singaporeans are not that different from other Asian first-world economies such as Japan, Korea and Taiwan, where government ministers do not command such high salaries.
Finland, for instance, beat Singapore in the WEF and Transparency International polls -- as second-most competitive and most corruption-free country -- but its Prime Minister Matti Vanhanen earns about a sixth of Lee's estimated salary.
What irks Singapore's opposition parties is that the million-dollar salaries are only accessible to members of Lee's ruling People's Action Party. Opposition politicians have been crippled by defamation lawsuits brought by government ministers and no opposition party has ever held a ministerial post.
The opposition also argues that a million-dollar pay hike is unwarranted for leaders of a country that has no legal minimum wage and where 20 percent of the population earns an average monthly salary of S$1,500.
But Lee Kuan Yew -- modern Singapore's first prime minister, who is still the leading voice in his son's cabinet -- will have none of it.
"The cure to all this talk is really a good dose of incompetent government," Lee senior told the Straits Times on Thursday, adding that it is "absurd" for Singaporeans to quarrel about ministerial pay and warning that Singapore would suffer it the government could not pay competitive salaries.
"Your security will be at risk and our women will become maids in other people's countries," he said.
(Additional reporting by Sakari Suoninen in Helsinki, Isabel Reynolds in Tokyo, Joanne Allen in Washington)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)